Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Health

Top Doctors Caution Against Expensive Multi-Cancer Detection Tests

Top doctors are cautioning against the use of expensive blood tests that claim to detect 50 types of cancer, emphasizing the importance of not skipping regular screenings. Multi-cancer detection tests (MCDs) have gained popularity as potential alternatives to invasive procedures like colonoscopies and mammograms. These tests, primarily involving blood draws, aim to identify abnormal proteins and cells indicative of cancer.

Similar to the controversial full-body MRI scans endorsed by celebrities like Kim Kardashian and Gwyneth Paltrow, many MCDs assert the ability to detect cancer before symptoms manifest, enabling early-stage diagnosis. However, experts speaking at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in Chicago have expressed reservations, stating that although initial studies are promising, they do not recommend widespread adoption of these tests as they are not yet fully validated.

Concerns raised by doctors include the potential for false positives from MCDs, leading to unnecessary follow-up tests for patients. Moreover, these tests are not covered by insurance, with each test costing over $1,000. The cautionary advice from healthcare professionals coincides with recent updates to screening guidelines for colorectal and breast cancers, aiming to address the rising incidence of these diseases among young individuals.

Dr. Chyke Doubeni, a family medicine expert at Ohio State University, highlighted the lack of conclusive evidence supporting the efficacy of MCDs, stating that these tests are not currently deemed suitable for widespread use due to the inherent risks involved. He emphasized the potential for harm associated with these tests, regardless of the perspective.

While some recent studies, including trials conducted by the University of Oxford, have shown promising results for MCDs, with one study identifying 182 distinct proteins in blood samples of individuals diagnosed with cancer compared to those without the disease, the overall readiness and reliability of these tests remain under scrutiny.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *