Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Tech/Science

Tech Giants Accuse Apple of Non-Compliance in Epic Games Trial

Apple is facing accusations from major tech companies like Meta and Microsoft, who claim that the tech giant is not complying with a court order in its trial against Epic Games. The dispute revolves around Apple’s App Store rules, particularly its 15 to 30 percent fees on in-app purchases, which have sparked controversy among app developers.

In an amicus brief filed with the court, Meta, Microsoft, Match Group, and X expressed their concerns about Apple’s compliance plans, arguing that they would not introduce more price competition for app payments. The brief highlights the ongoing battle between Apple and app developers regarding the display of alternative payment options outside of the iOS ecosystem.

According to the brief, Apple’s proposed solution to allow developers to point to an external purchase link is deemed complex and burdensome. The companies assert that Apple’s new restrictions are designed to render alternatives to its in-app purchase system impractical for developers and unappealing to consumers, thus circumventing the spirit and goals of the injunction issued by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in 2021.

Epic Games, the plaintiff in the trial against Apple, has also urged the judge to enforce the original order, claiming that Apple is in blatant violation of the injunction. The involvement of other major developers, such as Meta and Microsoft, in the dispute underscores the far-reaching impact of Apple’s rules, demonstrating that even the largest tech companies are affected.

The amici argue that Apple’s 12 to 27 percent fee on external purchases undermines the purpose of the new requirement, as it only represents a marginal difference from the fees imposed on in-app purchases. This fee could potentially make it financially unfeasible for developers to establish an external payments system, given the additional transaction costs they would incur. Moreover, consumers are unlikely to opt for the external option if the price remains the same as Apple’s system.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *