Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Business

Judge dismisses Disney’s lawsuit against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has emerged victorious as a US judge dismissed a lawsuit filed by Disney against him. The lawsuit accused DeSantis of orchestrating a campaign of ‘government retaliation’, but Judge Allen Winsor ruled in favor of the governor, stating that the actions in question were legal and that Disney lacked standing to sue.

The dispute between DeSantis and Disney stemmed from Florida’s move to tighten oversight of Disney’s amusement park, following the company’s criticism of a state law restricting the teaching of sexuality in schools. The changes granted DeSantis the power to appoint members to the district’s governing board, a move that Disney argued was detrimental to its interests.

In his ruling, Judge Winsor upheld the state legislators’ right to make the changes and stated that Disney had failed to prove it faced any imminent harm from the governor’s actions. He emphasized that courts cannot declare a law unconstitutional solely based on lawmakers’ potential ‘illegitimate motivation’ in enacting it.

Disney expressed its intention to continue pursuing the case, asserting that the lawsuit holds serious implications for the rule of law. The company argued that allowing such actions to go unchallenged would set a dangerous precedent, enabling states to misuse their official powers to suppress political viewpoints they disagree with.

The conflict between Disney and DeSantis began as the governor was gearing up for a presidential campaign. Despite dropping out of the race after a disappointing showing in the Iowa caucuses, DeSantis’s challenge to Disney, the largest employer in the state, bolstered his national profile and solidified his image as a culture warrior.

However, his actions also incurred costs, causing unease among traditional, business-friendly Republicans and drawing criticism from former President Donald Trump. The feud was sparked by Disney’s public criticism of the Parental Rights in Education Act, also known as the ‘Don’t Say Gay’ bill, which prohibited discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity for young students, a ban that was later extended to all grades.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *