Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Tech/Science

HDMI Forum Blocks Open Source Implementation, Impacting Linux Users

The HDMI Forum has reportedly told AMD that it does not allow an open source implementation of the HDMI 2.1 specification, effectively blocking tools such as AMD’s FreeSync from working over HDMI connections at high resolutions and frame rates on Linux systems.

Linux users have been left in a lurch as the licensing group controlling the HDMI standard, the HDMI Forum, has not made the HDMI 2.1 specification publicly accessible. This decision has significant implications for Linux users, as they are unable to achieve the same resolutions and speeds as Windows users or those using DisplayPort connections.

According to a report by the Linux blog Phoronix in January 2021, the HDMI Forum did not provide public access to the HDMI 2.1 specification. Alex Deucher, an AMD engineer, has been working on a related bug thread for over two years, but the recent outcome has been disappointing. The HDMI Forum has rejected the proposal, making it clear that an open source HDMI 2.1 implementation is currently not feasible without violating the HDMI Forum’s requirements.

AMD has been navigating legal hurdles in an attempt to comply with the HDMI Forum’s regulations. Despite efforts to get the basic functionality up and running, the decision ultimately rested with the HDMI Forum. The Forum’s membership comes with a minimum cost of $15,000, and while AMD is a member, it does not extend to offering a specification for public use.

As a result of this development, Linux users are now left with DisplayPort as the primary option for achieving the best possible output. The rejection of an open source HDMI 2.1 implementation has raised concerns and speculation, with some suggesting potential interference from media firms worried about digital video ripping.

This decision has significant implications for the Linux community and highlights the ongoing challenges faced by open source developers in accessing and implementing industry standards. The lack of support for open source HDMI 2.1 drivers on Linux systems underscores the need for greater collaboration and dialogue between industry stakeholders to address the needs of diverse user groups.

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *