On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is set to vote on its 435-page net neutrality order, sparking concerns from various industry and consumer groups. The draft order, if passed, would reinstate net neutrality rules but exempt broadband providers like AT&T and Comcast from contributing to the Universal Service Fund (USF).

The USF, established by Congress in 1996, aims to support affordable phone access. However, the issue of USF funding has resurfaced as the FCC considers reinstating a ‘fast, open and fair’ internet through net neutrality.

Industry and consumer groups fear that the draft order may neglect the contribution of broadband internet service providers to the USF, potentially leading to a lack of funding for essential programs. The Affordable Broadband Campaign (ABC) advocates for utilizing the USF to replace the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) and ensure continued support for over 23 million households.

ABC spokesperson Gigi Sohn criticized the FCC’s proposal to exempt broadband providers from USF contributions, highlighting the importance of closing the digital divide. Sohn’s group, along with others, opposes FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel’s stance on this issue.

Rosenworcel defended the exemption in a letter to Sen. Ben Ray Lujan, citing concerns about potential increases in monthly broadband bills if mass market broadband providers were included in USF contributions.

As the FCC prepares for the crucial vote on net neutrality, the debate over USF funding and its implications for affordable connectivity continues to intensify among stakeholders.